“Are Boccaccio’s Decameron and Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales closer in outlook to Greek and Roman literature than they are to Hebrew, Christian, and medieval literature?”
A group of short stories told by medieval commoners were all pieced together to create two notorious compositions of literature that we know today as Canterbury Tales and Decameron. Although both were created by separate authors, they share many similarities that we can use to categorize them.
The Canterbury Tales was written in Middle English which was used between the 12th and 15th centuries and was derived from European romantic languages. Similarly, Decameron was written in Florentine (a variety of Tuscan and a common romance language). Using this observation we can compare this to infamous Christian, Hebrew, and medieval classics such as; The City of God by St. Augustine and Little Flowers of St. Francis. Both were written in Latin, a well known liturgical language of the Catholic Church. This alone can prove the differences in era and style between the books.
Likewise, we can compare each category of literature by analyzing what sets them apart from one another. Greek and Roman narratives usually follow fictional stories that tell of humans, mythical creatures, as well as Gods and Goddesses. The endings however are not always to teach a good lesson or rational and pure behavior. This cannot be said about the narratives of Christian, Hebrew, and Medieval literature which follow stories that teach the way of God and show examples of good morals that lead in the path of religion. The way I see it, Greek and Roman literature held more entertainment value whereas the latter (Christian, Hebrew, and Medieval) were used to demonstrate and inspire for those who followed God.
Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales includes a wide range of humor and diversity within the characters. This is central to its popularity within his audience. The twenty four stories were told by a group of people who had set out on a pilgrimage to Canterbury somewhere around 1380. Even consisting of a tale about a woman who was having an affair with a scholar and to hide from her husband they both had to play out ridiculous scenarios. These stories were not necessarily to teach a lesson or to paint an image of God but to express humor and to entertain, especially during a time where working class people were underestimated and looked down upon.
Boccaccio’s Decameron consists of one hundred stories told by a group of ten people taking refuge from the Plague around 1350. Again, these stories were a form of entertainment, as a way to pass time and lighten the scene. The group of ten told these one hundred stories in the span of ten days, with each person being granted one day to dictate the theme of the stories. Decameron includes tales of love, lust, envy, family, and adventure (ending both tragically and happily).
With all this said, yes I personally do believe that both Chaucer and Boccaccio’s pieces relate closer to Greek and Roman literature rather than that of Christian, Hebrew, and Medieval. But If there is anything I learned from their work, it’s that no matter what situation you may find yourself in, your mind and imagination is a powerful tool that if used correctly, can bring happiness to yourself and those around you.